TopBP1 utilises a bipartite GINS binding mode to support genome replication.

Activation of the replicative Mcm2-7 helicase by loading GINS and Cdc45 is crucial for replication origin firing, and as such for faithful genetic inheritance. Our biochemical and structural studies demonstrate that the helicase activator GINS interacts with TopBP1 through two separate binding surfaces, the first involving a stretch of highly conserved amino acids in the TopBP1-GINI region, the second a surface on TopBP1-BRCT4. The two surfaces bind to opposite ends of the A domain of the GINS subunit Psf1. Mutation analysis reveals that either surface is individually able to support TopBP1-GINS interaction, albeit with reduced affinity. Consistently, either surface is sufficient for replication origin firing in Xenopus egg extracts and becomes essential in the absence of the other. The TopBP1-GINS interaction appears sterically incompatible with simultaneous binding of DNA polymerase epsilon (Polε) to GINS when bound to Mcm2-7-Cdc45, although TopBP1-BRCT4 and the Polε subunit PolE2 show only partial competitivity in binding to Psf1. Our TopBP1-GINS model improves the understanding of the recently characterised metazoan pre-loading complex. It further predicts the coordination of three molecular origin firing processes, DNA polymerase epsilon arrival, TopBP1 ejection and GINS integration into Mcm2-7-Cdc45.

DNA polymerase ε and δ variants drive mutagenesis in polypurine tracts in human tumors.

Alterations in the exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase ε cause ultramutated cancers. These cancers accumulate AGA>ATA transversions; however, their genomic features beyond the trinucleotide motifs are obscure. We analyze the extended DNA context of ultramutation using whole-exome sequencing data from 524 endometrial and 395 colorectal tumors. We find that G>T transversions in POLE-mutant tumors predominantly affect sequences containing at least six consecutive purines, with a striking preference for certain positions within polypurine tracts. Using this signature, we develop a machine-learning classifier to identify tumors with hitherto unknown POLE drivers and validate two drivers, POLE-E978G and POLE-S461L, by functional assays in yeast. Unlike other pathogenic variants, the E978G substitution affects the polymerase domain of Pol ε. We further show that tumors with POLD1 drivers share the extended signature of POLE ultramutation. These findings expand the understanding of ultramutation mechanisms and highlight peculiar mutagenic properties of polypurine tracts in the human genome.

The P286R mutation of DNA polymerase ε activates cancer-cell-intrinsic immunity and suppresses endometrial tumorigenesis via the cGAS-STING pathway.

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is a prevalent gynecological tumor in women, and its treatment and prevention are significant global health concerns. The mutations in DNA polymerase ε (POLE) are recognized as key features of EC and may confer survival benefits in endometrial cancer patients undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. However, the anti-tumor mechanism of POLE mutations remains largely elusive. This study demonstrates that the hot POLE P286R mutation impedes endometrial tumorigenesis by inducing DNA breakage and activating the cGAS-STING signaling pathway. The POLE mutations were found to inhibit the proliferation and stemness of primary human EC cells. Mechanistically, the POLE mutants enhance DNA damage and suppress its repair through the interaction with DNA repair proteins, leading to genomic instability and the upregulation of cytoplasmic DNA. Additionally, the POLE P286R mutant also increases cGAS level, promotes TBK1 phosphorylation, and stimulates inflammatory gene expression and anti-tumor immune response. Furthermore, the POLE P286R mutation inhibits tumor growth and facilitates the infiltration of cytotoxic T cells in human endometrial cancers. These findings uncover a novel mechanism of POLE mutations in antagonizing tumorigenesis and provide a promising direction for effective cancer therapy.

Congenital anaemia associated with loss-of-function variants in DNA polymerase epsilon 1.

DNA polymerase epsilon (Pol ε), a component of the core replisome, is involved in DNA replication. Although genetic defects of Pol ε have been reported to cause immunodeficiency syndromes, its role in haematopoiesis remains unknown. Here, we identified compound heterozygous variants (p.[Asp1131fs];[Thr1891del]) in POLE, encoding Pol ε catalytic subunit A (POLE1), in siblings with a syndromic form of severe congenital transfusion-dependent anaemia. In contrast to Diamond-Blackfan anaemia, marked reticulocytopenia or marked erythroid hypoplasia was not found. Their bone marrow aspirates during infancy revealed erythroid dysplasia with strongly positive TP53 in immunostaining. Repetitive examinations demonstrated trilineage myelodysplasia within 2 years from birth. They had short stature and facial dysmorphism. HEK293 cell-based expression experiments and analyses of patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) disclosed a reduced mRNA level of Asp1131fs-POLE1 and defective nuclear translocation of Thr1891del-POLE1. Analysis of iPSCs showed compensatory mRNA upregulation of the other replisome components and increase of the TP53 protein, both suggesting dysfunction of the replisome. We created Pole-knockout medaka fish and found that heterozygous fishes were viable, but with decreased RBCs. Our observations expand the phenotypic spectrum of the Pol ε defect in humans, additionally providing unique evidence linking Pol ε to haematopoiesis.

Exploring the basis of heterogeneity of cancer aggressiveness among the mutated POLE variants.

Germline pathogenic variants in the exonuclease domain of the replicative DNA polymerase Pol ε encoded by the POLE gene, predispose essentially to colorectal and endometrial tumors by inducing an ultramutator phenotype. It is still unclear whether all the POLE alterations influence similar strength tumorigenesis, immune microenvironment, and treatment response. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms and consequences of POLE mutations in human malignancies; we highlight the heterogeneity of mutation rate and cancer aggressiveness among POLE variants, propose some mechanistic basis underlining such heterogeneity, and discuss novel considerations for the choice and efficacy of therapies of POLE tumors.

The proofreading exonuclease of leading-strand DNA polymerase epsilon prevents replication fork collapse at broken template strands.

Leading-strand DNA replication by polymerase epsilon (Polϵ) across single-strand breaks (SSBs) causes single-ended double-strand breaks (seDSBs), which are repaired via homology-directed repair (HDR) and suppressed by fork reversal (FR). Although previous studies identified many molecules required for hydroxyurea-induced FR, FR at seDSBs is poorly understood. Here, we identified molecules that specifically mediate FR at seDSBs. Because FR at seDSBs requires poly(ADP ribose)polymerase 1 (PARP1), we hypothesized that seDSB/FR-associated molecules would increase tolerance to camptothecin (CPT) but not the PARP inhibitor olaparib, even though both anti-cancer agents generate seDSBs. Indeed, we uncovered that Polϵ exonuclease and CTF18, a Polϵ cofactor, increased tolerance to CPT but not olaparib. To explore potential functional interactions between Polϵ exonuclease, CTF18, and PARP1, we created exonuclease-deficient POLE1exo-/-, CTF18-/-, PARP1-/-, CTF18-/-/POLE1exo-/-, PARP1-/-/POLE1exo-/-, and CTF18-/-/PARP1-/- cells. Epistasis analysis indicated that Polϵ exonuclease and CTF18 were interdependent and required PARP1 for CPT tolerance. Remarkably, POLE1exo-/- and HDR-deficient BRCA1-/- cells exhibited similar CPT sensitivity. Moreover, combining POLE1exo-/- with BRCA1-/- mutations synergistically increased CPT sensitivity. In conclusion, the newly identified PARP1-CTF18-Polϵ exonuclease axis and HDR act independently to prevent fork collapse at seDSBs. Olaparib inhibits this axis, explaining the pronounced cytotoxic effects of olaparib on HDR-deficient cells.

A simple bypass assay for DNA polymerases shows that cancer-associated hypermutating variants exhibit differences in vitro.

Errors made by DNA polymerases contribute to both natural variation and, in extreme cases, genome instability and its associated diseases. Recently, the importance of polymerase misincorporation in disease has been highlighted by the identification of cancer-associated polymerase variants with mutations in the exonuclease domain. A subgroup of these variants have a hypermutation phenotype in tumours, and when modelled in yeast, they show mutation rates in excess of that seen with polymerase with simple loss of proofreading activity. We have developed a bypass assay to rapidly determine the tendency of a polymerase to misincorporate in vitro. We have used the assay to compare misincorporation by wild-type, exonuclease-defective and two hypermutating human DNA polymerase ε variants, P286R and V411L. The assay clearly distinguished between the misincorporation rates of wild-type, exonuclease dead and P286R polymerases. However, the V411L polymerase showed misincorporation rate comparable to the exonuclease dead enzyme rather than P286R, suggesting that there may be some differences in the way that these variants cause hypermutation. Using this assay, misincorporation opposite a templated C nucleotide was consistently higher than for other nucleotides, and this caused predominantly C-to-T transitions. This is consistent with the observation that C-to-T transitions are commonly seen in DNA polymerase ε mutant tumours.

RNA polymerase II associates with active genes during DNA replication.

The transcriptional machinery is thought to dissociate from DNA during replication. Certain proteins, termed epigenetic marks, must be transferred from parent to daughter DNA strands in order to maintain the memory of transcriptional states1,2. These proteins are believed to re-initiate rebuilding of chromatin structure, which ultimately recruits RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to the newly replicated daughter strands. It is believed that Pol II is recruited back to active genes only after chromatin is rebuilt3,4. However, there is little experimental evidence addressing the central questions of when and how Pol II is recruited back to the daughter strands and resumes transcription. Here we show that immediately after passage of the replication fork, Pol II in complex with other general transcription proteins and immature RNA re-associates with active genes on both leading and lagging strands of nascent DNA, and rapidly resumes transcription. This suggests that the transcriptionally active Pol II complex is retained in close proximity to DNA, with a Pol II-PCNA interaction potentially underlying this retention. These findings indicate that the Pol II machinery may not require epigenetic marks to be recruited to the newly synthesized DNA during the transition from DNA replication to resumption of transcription.

Impairment of the non-catalytic subunit Dpb2 of DNA Pol ɛ results in increased involvement of Pol δ on the leading strand.

The generally accepted model assumes that leading strand synthesis is performed by Pol ε, while lagging-strand synthesis is catalyzed by Pol δ. Pol ε has been shown to target the leading strand by interacting with the CMG helicase [Cdc45 Mcm2-7 GINS(Psf1-3, Sld5)]. Proper functioning of the CMG-Pol ɛ, the helicase-polymerase complex is essential for its progression and the fidelity of DNA replication. Dpb2p, the essential non-catalytic subunit of Pol ε plays a key role in maintaining the correct architecture of the replisome by acting as a link between Pol ε and the CMG complex. Using a temperature-sensitive dpb2-100 mutant previously isolated in our laboratory, and a genetic system which takes advantage of a distinct mutational signature of the Pol δ-L612M variant which allows detection of the involvement of Pol δ in the replication of particular DNA strands we show that in yeast cells with an impaired Dpb2 subunit, the contribution of Pol δ to the replication of the leading strand is significantly increased.

DNA polymerase ε leading strand signature mutations result from defects in its proofreading activity.

The evidence that purified pol2-M644G DNA polymerase (Pol)ε exhibits a highly elevated bias for forming T:dTTP mispairs over A:dATP mispairs and that yeast cells harboring this Polε mutation accumulate A > T signature mutations in the leading strand have been used to assign a role for Polε in replicating the leading strand. Here, we determine whether A > T signature mutations result from defects in Polε proofreading activity by analyzing their rate in Polε proofreading defective pol2-4 and pol2-M644G cells. Since purified pol2-4 Polε exhibits no bias for T:dTTP mispair formation, A > T mutations are expected to occur at a much lower rate in pol2-4 than in pol2-M644G cells if Polε replicated the leading strand. Instead, we find that the rate of A > T signature mutations are as highly elevated in pol2-4 cells as in pol2-M644G cells; furthermore, the highly elevated rate of A > T signature mutations is severely curtailed in the absence of PCNA ubiquitination or Polζ in both the pol2-M644G and pol2-4 strains. Altogether, our evidence supports the conclusion that the leading strand A > T signature mutations derive from defects in Polε proofreading activity and not from the role of Polε as a leading strand replicase, and it conforms with the genetic evidence for a major role of Polδ in replication of both the DNA strands.

CTF18-RFC contributes to cellular tolerance against chain-terminating nucleoside analogs (CTNAs) in cooperation with proofreading exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase ε.

Chemotherapeutic nucleoside analogs, such as cytarabine (Ara-C), are incorporated into genomic DNA during replication. Incorporated Ara-CMP (Ara-cytidine monophosphate) serves as a chain terminator and inhibits DNA synthesis by replicative polymerase epsilon (Polε). The proofreading exonuclease activity of Polε removes the misincorporated Ara-CMP, thereby contributing to the cellular tolerance to Ara-C. Purified Polε performs proofreading, and it is generally believed that proofreading in vivo does not need additional factors. In this study, we demonstrated that the proofreading by Polε in vivo requires CTF18, a component of the leading-strand replisome. We found that loss of CTF18 in chicken DT40 cells and human TK6 cells results in hypersensitivity to Ara-C, indicating the conserved function of CTF18 in the cellular tolerance of Ara-C. Strikingly, we found that proofreading-deficient POLE1D269A/-, CTF18-/-, and POLE1D269A/-/CTF18-/- cells showed indistinguishable phenotypes, including the extent of hypersensitivity to Ara-C and decreased replication rate with Ara-C. This observed epistatic relationship between POLE1D269A/- and CTF18-/- suggests that they are interdependent in removing mis-incorporated Ara-CMP from the 3' end of primers. Mechanistically, we found that CTF18-/- cells have reduced levels of chromatin-bound Polε upon Ara-C treatment, suggesting that CTF18 contributes to the tethering of Polε on fork at the stalled end and thereby facilitating the removal of inserted Ara-C. Collectively, these data reveal the previously unappreciated role of CTF18 in Polε-exonuclease-mediated maintenance of the replication fork upon Ara-C incorporation.

Oncogenic YAP mediates changes in chromatin accessibility and activity that drive cell cycle gene expression and cell migration.

YAP, the key protein effector of the Hippo pathway, is a transcriptional co-activator that controls the expression of cell cycle genes, promotes cell growth and proliferation and regulates organ size. YAP modulates gene transcription by binding to distal enhancers, but the mechanisms of gene regulation by YAP-bound enhancers remain poorly understood. Here we show that constitutive active YAP5SA leads to widespread changes in chromatin accessibility in untransformed MCF10A cells. Newly accessible regions include YAP-bound enhancers that mediate activation of cycle genes regulated by the Myb-MuvB (MMB) complex. By CRISPR-interference we identify a role for YAP-bound enhancers in phosphorylation of Pol II at Ser5 at MMB-regulated promoters, extending previously published studies that suggested YAP primarily regulates the pause-release step and transcriptional elongation. YAP5SA also leads to less accessible 'closed' chromatin regions, which are not directly YAP-bound but which contain binding motifs for the p53 family of transcription factors. Diminished accessibility at these regions is, at least in part, a consequence of reduced expression and chromatin-binding of the p53 family member ΔNp63 resulting in downregulation of ΔNp63-target genes and promoting YAP-mediated cell migration. In summary, our studies uncover changes in chromatin accessibility and activity that contribute to the oncogenic activities of YAP.

Characterization of POLE c.1373A > T p.(Tyr458Phe), causing high cancer risk.

The cancer syndrome polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis results from germline mutations in the POLE and POLD1 genes. Mutations in the exonuclease domain of these genes are associated with hyper- and ultra-mutated tumors with a predominance of base substitutions resulting from faulty proofreading during DNA replication. When a new variant is identified by gene testing of POLE and POLD1, it is important to verify whether the variant is associated with PPAP or not, to guide genetic counseling of mutation carriers. In 2015, we reported the likely pathogenic (class 4) germline POLE c.1373A > T p.(Tyr458Phe) variant and we have now characterized this variant to verify that it is a class 5 pathogenic variant. For this purpose, we investigated (1) mutator phenotype in tumors from two carriers, (2) mutation frequency in cell-based mutagenesis assays, and (3) structural consequences based on protein modeling. Whole-exome sequencing of two tumors identified an ultra-mutator phenotype with a predominance of base substitutions, the majority of which are C > T. A SupF mutagenesis assay revealed increased mutation frequency in cells overexpressing the variant of interest as well as in isogenic cells encoding the variant. Moreover, exonuclease repair yeast-based assay supported defect in proofreading activity. Lastly, we present a homology model of human POLE to demonstrate structural consequences leading to pathogenic impact of the p.(Tyr458Phe) mutation. The three lines of evidence, taken together with updated co-segregation and previously published data, allow the germline variant POLE c.1373A > T p.(Tyr458Phe) to be reclassified as a class 5 variant. That means the variant is associated with PPAP.

Mismatch repair operates at the replication fork in direct competition with mismatch extension by DNA polymerase δ.

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) in eukaryotes is believed to occur post-replicatively, wherein nicks or gaps in the nascent DNA strand are suggested to serve as strand discrimination signals. However, how such signals are generated in the nascent leading strand has remained unclear. Here we examine the alternative possibility that MMR occurs in conjunction with the replication fork. To this end, we utilize mutations in the PCNA interacting peptide (PIP) domain of the Pol3 or Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerase δ (Polδ) and show that these pip mutations suppress the greatly elevated mutagenesis in yeast strains harboring the pol3-01 mutation defective in Polδ proofreading activity. And strikingly, they suppress the synthetic lethality of pol3-01 pol2-4 double mutant strains, which arises from the vastly enhanced mutability due to defects in the proofreading functions of both Polδ and Polε. Our finding that suppression of elevated mutagenesis in pol3-01 by the Polδ pip mutations requires intact MMR supports the conclusion that MMR operates at the replication fork in direct competition with other mismatch removal processes and with extension of synthesis from the mispair by Polδ. Furthermore, the evidence that Polδ pip mutations eliminate almost all the mutability of pol2-4 msh2Δ or pol3-01 pol2-4 adds strong support for a major role of Polδ in replication of both the leading and lagging DNA strands.

The evolving tale of Pol2 function.

DNA replication is complex and highly regulated, and DNA replication errors can lead to human diseases such as cancer. DNA polymerase ε (polε) is a key player in DNA replication and contains a large subunit called POLE, which possesses both a DNA polymerase domain and a 3'-5' exonuclease domain (EXO). Mutations at the EXO domain and other missense mutations on POLE with unknown significance have been detected in a variety of human cancers. Based on cancer genome databases, Meng and colleagues (pp. 74-79) previously identified several missense mutations in POPS (pol2 family-specific catalytic core peripheral subdomain), and mutations at the conserved residues of yeast Pol2 (pol2-REL) showed reduced DNA synthesis and growth. In this issue of Genes & Development, Meng and colleagues (pp. 74-79) found unexpectedly that mutations at the EXO domain rescue the growth defects of pol2-REL. They further discovered that EXO-mediated polymerase backtracking impedes forward movement of the enzyme when POPS is defective, revealing a novel interplay between the EXO domain and POPS of Pol2 for efficient DNA synthesis. Additional molecular insight into this interplay will likely inform the impact of cancer-associated mutations found in both the EXO domain and POPS on tumorigenesis and uncover future novel therapeutic strategies.

Balancing act of a leading strand DNA polymerase-specific domain and its exonuclease domain promotes genome-wide sister replication fork symmetry.

Pol2 is the leading-strand DNA polymerase in budding yeast. Here we describe an antagonism between its conserved POPS (Pol2 family-specific catalytic core peripheral subdomain) and exonuclease domain and the importance of this antagonism in genome replication. We show that multiple defects caused by POPS mutations, including impaired growth and DNA synthesis, genome instability, and reliance on other genome maintenance factors, were rescued by exonuclease inactivation. Single-molecule data revealed that the rescue stemmed from allowing sister replication forks to progress at equal rates. Our data suggest that balanced activity of Pol2's POPS and exonuclease domains is vital for genome replication and stability.

Integrating transcription and splicing into cell fate: Transcription factors on the block.

Transcription factors (TFs) are present in all life forms and conserved across great evolutionary distances in eukaryotes. From yeast to complex multicellular organisms, they are pivotal players of cell fate decision by orchestrating gene expression at diverse molecular layers. Notably, TFs fine-tune gene expression by coordinating RNA fate at both the expression and splicing levels. They regulate alternative splicing, an essential mechanism for cell plasticity, allowing the production of many mRNA and protein isoforms in precise cell and tissue contexts. Despite this apparent role in splicing, how TFs integrate transcription and splicing to ultimately orchestrate diverse cell functions and cell fate decisions remains puzzling. We depict substantial studies in various model organisms underlining the key role of TFs in alternative splicing for promoting tissue-specific functions and cell fate. Furthermore, we emphasize recent advances describing the molecular link between the transcriptional and splicing activities of TFs. As TFs can bind both DNA and/or RNA to regulate transcription and splicing, we further discuss their flexibility and compatibility for DNA and RNA substrates. Finally, we propose several models integrating transcription and splicing activities of TFs in the coordination and diversification of cell and tissue identities. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > Splicing Regulation/Alternative Splicing RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications RNA Processing > Splicing Mechanisms.

Yeast 9-1-1 complex acts as a sliding clamp for DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase ε.

Eukaryotic cells harbor two DNA-binding clamps, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and another clamp commonly referred to as 9-1-1 clamp. In contrast to the essential role of PCNA in DNA replication as a sliding clamp for DNA polymerase (Pol) δ, no such role in DNA synthesis has been identified for the human 9-1-1 clamp or the orthologous yeast 17-3-1 clamp. The only role identified for either the 9-1-1 or 17-3-1 clamp is in the recruitment of signal transduction kinases, which affect the activation of cell cycle checkpoints in response to DNA damage. However, unlike the loading of PCNA by the replication factor C (RFC) clamp loader onto 3'-recessed DNA junctions for processive DNA synthesis by Polδ, the 17-3-1 clamp or the 9-1-1 clamp is loaded by their respective clamp loader Rad24-RFC or RAD17-RFC onto the 5'-recessed DNA junction of replication protein A-coated DNA for the recruitment of signal transduction kinases. Here, we identify a novel role of 17-3-1 clamp as a sliding clamp for DNA synthesis by Polε. We provide evidence that similar to the loading of PCNA by RFC, the 17-3-1 clamp is loaded by the Rad24-RFC clamp loader at the 3'-recessed DNA junction in an ATP-dependent manner. However, unlike PCNA, the 17-3-1 clamp does not enhance the processivity of DNA synthesis by Polε; instead, it greatly increases the catalytic efficiency of Polε for correct nucleotide incorporation. Furthermore, we show that the same PCNA-interacting peptide domain in the polymerase 2 catalytic subunit mediates Polε interaction with the 17-3-1 clamp and with PCNA.

The clinicopathological characteristics of POLE-mutated/ultramutated endometrial carcinoma and prognostic value of POLE status: a meta-analysis based on 49 articles incorporating 12,120 patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the frequency and clinicopathological characteristics of POLE-mutated/ultramutated (POLEmut) in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and assess the prognostic values of POLE status. METHODS: Electronic databases were screened to identify relevant studies. Meta-analysis was used to yield the pooled frequency of POLEmut and prognostic parameters by 95% confidence interval (CI), odd ratio (OR), and hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: Totally, 12,120 EC patients from 49 studies were included. The pooled frequency of POLEmut was 7.95% (95% CI: 6.52-9.51%) in EC, 7.95% (95% CI: 6.55-9.46%) in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, and 4.45% (95% CI: 2.63-6.61%) in nonendometrioid endometrial carcinoma. A higher expression occurred in grade 3 (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.73, P = 0.0002), FIGO stage I-II (OR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.29-2.83, P = 0.0013), and myometrial invasion< 50% (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.86, P = 0.0025). Survival analyses revealed favorable OS (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.55-0.85, P = 0.0008), PFS (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59-0.93, P = 0.0085), DSS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.83, P = 0.0016), and RFS (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35-0.61, P <  0.0001) for POLEmut ECs. Additionally, the clinical outcomes of POLEmut group were the best, but those of p53-abnormal/mutated (p53abn) group were the worst, while those of microsatellite-instable (MSI)/hypermutated group and p53-wild-type (p53wt) group were medium. CONCLUSIONS: The POLEmut emergered higher expression in ECs with grade 3, FIGO stage I-II, and myometrial invasion< 50%; it might serve as a highly favorable prognostic marker in EC; the clinical outcomes of POLEmut group were the best one among the four molecular subtypes.

The non-catalytic role of DNA polymerase epsilon in replication initiation in human cells.

DNA polymerase epsilon (PolE) in an enzyme essential for DNA replication. Deficiencies and mutations in PolE cause severe developmental abnormalities and cancers. Paradoxically, the catalytic domain of yeast PolE catalytic subunit is dispensable for survival, and its non-catalytic essential function is linked with replicative helicase (CMG) assembly. Less is known about the PolE role in replication initiation in human cells. Here we use an auxin-inducible degron system to study the effect of POLE1 depletion on replication initiation in U2OS cells. POLE1-depleted cells were able to assemble CMG helicase and initiate DNA synthesis that failed shortly after. Expression of POLE1 non-catalytic domain rescued this defect resulting in slow, but continuous DNA synthesis. We propose a model where in human U2OS cells POLE1/POLE2 are dispensable for CMG assembly, but essential during later steps of replication initiation. Our study provides some insights into the role of PolE in replication initiation in human cells.